“Report From Iron Mountain: The Possibility and Desirability of Peace”
Just look at the title. “Desirability of Peace”! Someone wants to analyze how desirable peace is? And they took over 2½ years to answer that question. And then according to the Foreword, the report was suppressed. The only way it was published in 1967, was one of those on the Special Study Group released it to Leonard C. Lewin, who went on to publish it.
My first reaction after just reading the Forward was it sounded like a hoax. In fact, it is alleged Lewin himself would claim it was a hoax in 1972. But I trust Dr. Robin Falkov, who had recommended it, and kept on reading.
The more I read, the nuttier it got. I decided to go back to the Foreword and review the basics. That was when I saw the date and mumbled some bad words. The Special Study Group had been formed in August 1963! The whistle blowing member believed, the original order for the report had come from at least the Kennedy Cabinet level. “No,” I thought, “it came from the President himself.”
...
Sounds to me like he was thinking about a world at peace. It makes complete sense Kennedy would have ordered a study be made, on how to accomplish this and what it would mean. This is a coincidence of timing that makes me favor the authenticity of the report. But what also points to authenticity, is recommendations suggested by the report we now see implemented.
The report concludes that war itself is the basic social system holding up modern civilization. Without well established war systems, modern civilization would fall apart. To understand what they reported, we will look at the different sections of society they claimed would have to undergo drastic changes in a peace environment.
One critical thing to keep in mind is, who was suppose to read this report. It was never for public consumption. It was to be presented to the leadership only. Thus, they could be very honest.
Economic Stability
Well this is obvious. How did we get out of the Great Depression? World War II. War makes the economy grow. But this study adds that war is inherently controlled arbitrarily, by politicians, aiding in control of the economy. The Fed’s manipulation of the amount of money in circulation, may not be sufficient enough to adjust the economy when needed; but war can. Need a huge impetus to the economy? Have a war.
So for the economy, whatever replaces war needs to be independent from the normal supply-demand economy. You have to be able to turn it on and off at the whim of leadership.
Weapon technological advancements are critical to the overall economic structure. Without war what would happen to all the war industries and technological advancements motivated by war?
A possible substitution for war, would be to take funding for war and turn it toward social welfare programs in the fields of health, education, housing, transportation, poverty and many other changes, beneficial for the average person. However this would only work for as long as things were getting fixed. Sooner or later the people would have all these social programs and expect to keep them. Control over the economy could not be maintained.
What they favored was a Space exploration program that would never slow down.
Political
They noted that starting war was not a necessity, as compromises are made daily all over the world. War should never be required to negotiate peaceful settlements between nations. However, they also said nations cannot exist without the unifying nature of having an outside enemy, and a leadership in control of the military forces that will keep the nation safe. This in turn creates a situation where nations have to counter the military might of other nations. War capability becomes a critical factor in diplomatic negotiations. If you have military might, you might as well flaunt it or even use it.
The report stresses the ability of military forces to also, as a policing force, control its own citizens. This power base influences the relationship of the government to its citizens. Without the ability to have a show of force, maintaining control of citizens is limited.
But the only way the citizens allow a substantial military to exist is, because of a substantial outside threat. A central government exists to withstand an outside threat. Without the threat, the citizens would not tolerate a powerful central government.
The offered solution to this problem of a threat makes things scary. A threat from extraterrestrial sources would be ideal, but the report writers did not think this would really happen. They did, however, suggest, "Experiments have been proposed to test the credibility of an out-of-world invasion threat; it is possible that a few of the more difficult-to-explain “flying saucer” incidents of recent years were in fact early experiments of this kind."
Why would they already, in 1963-1965, be testing the waters to see what the reaction would be to extraterrestrials? Interesting supposition.
Then the report proposes a massive environmental crisis could also pose a sufficient threat. They called it a “gross pollution of the environment”. They acknowledge that poisoning of the water, food and air were already ongoing, but would take generations before it could pose a credible threat. So they suggest maybe this process could be hurried along.
This is where it looks like the recommendation was taken. Now we have the Global Warming concept along with nuclear pollution of staggering proportions with the Japanese Fukushima continuing crisis. But all nuclear power systems pose horrendous problems. Fracking is doing a hell of a job on water. Genetic engineering by Monsanto is devastating the food crops.
If the Black Nobles intend to take over the world, they may run out of a substantial enemy once all nations are under their control. War may not be an option. Environmental destruction could have been started, to have a viable external threat and way to control the world’s citizens.
Sociological Control
This subject brings in some more unnerving thoughts. In the report, war constituted a way of controlling undesirables in the society. Unemployable - join the military. Juvenile delinquent - choose military over prison. The thirst for blood or just afraid of boredom - have a war. The military draft works at controlling undesirables of society.
The report believes people have a thirst for blood. Otherwise why did civilizations, essentially at peace because they had conquered all their neighbors, have grandiose blood sacrifices? Think of the Aztecs and the Roman Colosseum.
Along with having blood games (does football cross your mind?), the report suggests, “a sophisticated form of slavery may be an absolute prerequisite for social control in a world at peace.” Do you suppose the Birth Certificate scam could be called a sophisticated form of slavery?
Basic conclusion was, humans need an allegiance to a society for the society to survive. The only way to gain allegiance, requires a cause and a cause requires a threat.
Ecological
The category is confusing. What the report is talking about is, how humans respond to changes in the environment threatening their existence. Animals finding their food sources diminished by environmental changes migrate, in search for food and/or water. Humans have a war to decrease population.
One thing they say makes me question their thinking. They claim military forces take in the socially unfit, but also claim that war culls the best and brightest from society. This seems to be a contradiction.
They do note the modern war machine’s mass destruction is a better way to decrease the population, as a divergent population of dead people results. Ah, okay.
So war controls the population in an inefficient way. Animal migration causes the weak to perish. War takes the strongest and smartest first. So the report suggests, control of the population would be better served by controlling birthrate. They mention infanticide, sexual mutilation, monasticism, forced emigration, extensive capital punishment as not being sufficiently efficient.
They seem to be lamenting the fact deadly epidemics do not happen anymore (1966). Well pandemics are possible with the increasing strains of pestilence being genetically engineered, and we are not going to discuss that terror here. The Report did not anticipate this lovely turn to their problem, of being able to decrease the world population.
What they decided is a great solution, is to lace the water supply with birth prevention drugs, forcing the population to use artificial insemination. Now that is control!
Right now the amount of birth control drugs getting from the urine of users into the water supply through treatment and recycling of waste water, has become a concern and may eventually turn into a crisis.
With control over natural birth, they then would have in vitro fertilization or other techniques to manipulate the gene pool.
So what?
I cannot verify the validity of the reports authenticity. The very reason it has such interest is, it does seem to reflect the mindset of the Black Nobles. To do what we see them do, they have to posses the attitude and belief system toward humanity reflected in the report. A customs agent has to be a bully to be effective. The Black Nobles have to be sociopathic personalities to knowingly do what they do. Simple as that from my perspective.
The Black Nobles may not all be evil incarnate. But to some degree or another, they all have this ability to think like that displayed in the “Report from Iron Mountain”.
ORDER: http://cosmicreality.weebly.com/ordering.html
My first reaction after just reading the Forward was it sounded like a hoax. In fact, it is alleged Lewin himself would claim it was a hoax in 1972. But I trust Dr. Robin Falkov, who had recommended it, and kept on reading.
The more I read, the nuttier it got. I decided to go back to the Foreword and review the basics. That was when I saw the date and mumbled some bad words. The Special Study Group had been formed in August 1963! The whistle blowing member believed, the original order for the report had come from at least the Kennedy Cabinet level. “No,” I thought, “it came from the President himself.”
...
Sounds to me like he was thinking about a world at peace. It makes complete sense Kennedy would have ordered a study be made, on how to accomplish this and what it would mean. This is a coincidence of timing that makes me favor the authenticity of the report. But what also points to authenticity, is recommendations suggested by the report we now see implemented.
The report concludes that war itself is the basic social system holding up modern civilization. Without well established war systems, modern civilization would fall apart. To understand what they reported, we will look at the different sections of society they claimed would have to undergo drastic changes in a peace environment.
One critical thing to keep in mind is, who was suppose to read this report. It was never for public consumption. It was to be presented to the leadership only. Thus, they could be very honest.
Economic Stability
Well this is obvious. How did we get out of the Great Depression? World War II. War makes the economy grow. But this study adds that war is inherently controlled arbitrarily, by politicians, aiding in control of the economy. The Fed’s manipulation of the amount of money in circulation, may not be sufficient enough to adjust the economy when needed; but war can. Need a huge impetus to the economy? Have a war.
So for the economy, whatever replaces war needs to be independent from the normal supply-demand economy. You have to be able to turn it on and off at the whim of leadership.
Weapon technological advancements are critical to the overall economic structure. Without war what would happen to all the war industries and technological advancements motivated by war?
A possible substitution for war, would be to take funding for war and turn it toward social welfare programs in the fields of health, education, housing, transportation, poverty and many other changes, beneficial for the average person. However this would only work for as long as things were getting fixed. Sooner or later the people would have all these social programs and expect to keep them. Control over the economy could not be maintained.
What they favored was a Space exploration program that would never slow down.
Political
They noted that starting war was not a necessity, as compromises are made daily all over the world. War should never be required to negotiate peaceful settlements between nations. However, they also said nations cannot exist without the unifying nature of having an outside enemy, and a leadership in control of the military forces that will keep the nation safe. This in turn creates a situation where nations have to counter the military might of other nations. War capability becomes a critical factor in diplomatic negotiations. If you have military might, you might as well flaunt it or even use it.
The report stresses the ability of military forces to also, as a policing force, control its own citizens. This power base influences the relationship of the government to its citizens. Without the ability to have a show of force, maintaining control of citizens is limited.
But the only way the citizens allow a substantial military to exist is, because of a substantial outside threat. A central government exists to withstand an outside threat. Without the threat, the citizens would not tolerate a powerful central government.
The offered solution to this problem of a threat makes things scary. A threat from extraterrestrial sources would be ideal, but the report writers did not think this would really happen. They did, however, suggest, "Experiments have been proposed to test the credibility of an out-of-world invasion threat; it is possible that a few of the more difficult-to-explain “flying saucer” incidents of recent years were in fact early experiments of this kind."
Why would they already, in 1963-1965, be testing the waters to see what the reaction would be to extraterrestrials? Interesting supposition.
Then the report proposes a massive environmental crisis could also pose a sufficient threat. They called it a “gross pollution of the environment”. They acknowledge that poisoning of the water, food and air were already ongoing, but would take generations before it could pose a credible threat. So they suggest maybe this process could be hurried along.
This is where it looks like the recommendation was taken. Now we have the Global Warming concept along with nuclear pollution of staggering proportions with the Japanese Fukushima continuing crisis. But all nuclear power systems pose horrendous problems. Fracking is doing a hell of a job on water. Genetic engineering by Monsanto is devastating the food crops.
If the Black Nobles intend to take over the world, they may run out of a substantial enemy once all nations are under their control. War may not be an option. Environmental destruction could have been started, to have a viable external threat and way to control the world’s citizens.
Sociological Control
This subject brings in some more unnerving thoughts. In the report, war constituted a way of controlling undesirables in the society. Unemployable - join the military. Juvenile delinquent - choose military over prison. The thirst for blood or just afraid of boredom - have a war. The military draft works at controlling undesirables of society.
The report believes people have a thirst for blood. Otherwise why did civilizations, essentially at peace because they had conquered all their neighbors, have grandiose blood sacrifices? Think of the Aztecs and the Roman Colosseum.
Along with having blood games (does football cross your mind?), the report suggests, “a sophisticated form of slavery may be an absolute prerequisite for social control in a world at peace.” Do you suppose the Birth Certificate scam could be called a sophisticated form of slavery?
Basic conclusion was, humans need an allegiance to a society for the society to survive. The only way to gain allegiance, requires a cause and a cause requires a threat.
Ecological
The category is confusing. What the report is talking about is, how humans respond to changes in the environment threatening their existence. Animals finding their food sources diminished by environmental changes migrate, in search for food and/or water. Humans have a war to decrease population.
One thing they say makes me question their thinking. They claim military forces take in the socially unfit, but also claim that war culls the best and brightest from society. This seems to be a contradiction.
They do note the modern war machine’s mass destruction is a better way to decrease the population, as a divergent population of dead people results. Ah, okay.
So war controls the population in an inefficient way. Animal migration causes the weak to perish. War takes the strongest and smartest first. So the report suggests, control of the population would be better served by controlling birthrate. They mention infanticide, sexual mutilation, monasticism, forced emigration, extensive capital punishment as not being sufficiently efficient.
They seem to be lamenting the fact deadly epidemics do not happen anymore (1966). Well pandemics are possible with the increasing strains of pestilence being genetically engineered, and we are not going to discuss that terror here. The Report did not anticipate this lovely turn to their problem, of being able to decrease the world population.
What they decided is a great solution, is to lace the water supply with birth prevention drugs, forcing the population to use artificial insemination. Now that is control!
Right now the amount of birth control drugs getting from the urine of users into the water supply through treatment and recycling of waste water, has become a concern and may eventually turn into a crisis.
With control over natural birth, they then would have in vitro fertilization or other techniques to manipulate the gene pool.
So what?
I cannot verify the validity of the reports authenticity. The very reason it has such interest is, it does seem to reflect the mindset of the Black Nobles. To do what we see them do, they have to posses the attitude and belief system toward humanity reflected in the report. A customs agent has to be a bully to be effective. The Black Nobles have to be sociopathic personalities to knowingly do what they do. Simple as that from my perspective.
The Black Nobles may not all be evil incarnate. But to some degree or another, they all have this ability to think like that displayed in the “Report from Iron Mountain”.
ORDER: http://cosmicreality.weebly.com/ordering.html
